In terms of drawbacks, the main ones are lack of support, possible instability, and potential security issues. Also, updating such an image might be complicated if you can't apply official patches or if the patch has conflicts with updates.
I should outline the pros and cons. Pros could include specific patches that fix known issues, optimizations for KVM, ease of deployment as a qcow2 image. Cons would be lack of support from Fortinet, potential security risks from unofficial patches, and the uncertainty of maintaining such an image long-term.
Licensing is another aspect. Fortinet's licensing model for their VMs—does the patched image require a license? Probably yes, but since it's modified, there might be issues with activating the license through usual channels. fgtvm64kvmv721fbuild1254fortinetoutkvmqcow2 patched
Compatibility with other Fortinet products like FortiManager, FortiAnalyzer, or FortiCloud. The patched image should integrate the same as the official build if FortiOS compatibility is maintained.
Comparison with standard FortiGate KVM images: the standard image from Fortinet would be tested and certified, whereas the patched version is a modified build. The patched version might have experimental features or backported fixes not available in the official release, but at the cost of support and reliability. In terms of drawbacks, the main ones are
If the image is patched, it could include features like IPv6 improvements, updated security rules, or maybe fixes for specific CVEs. The user should check if those patches are documented. For example, if there was a known vulnerability in the original build that's fixed here, that's a plus.
I need to consider the target audience. Probably IT administrators or cloud engineers setting up a virtual firewall. They'd care about documentation, setup process, performance on KVM, available features, support for certain hardware (like SR-IOV for better network performance?), licensing, and security features. Pros could include specific patches that fix known
Performance-wise, maybe the image is optimized for KVM, leading to better throughput or lower latency compared to other virtualization methods. Features like acceleration for hardware offloading (like Intel VT-d, SR-IOV) might be enabled in the patched version to improve performance.